Discussion

Summary

Bridget spoke about the need for logic applied with creativity. We need to rethink how things can be, change our assumptions and the goals of the system. By doing this we can slow down and focus on the interpersonal interactions that bring meaning to life.

Jonathan recounted a recent project to talk about the impact of sea level rise on coastal communities. This made him reflect on his background, identity, and values and how this influences the way he approaches projects. Jonathan sees a need for engineers to build relationships, especially with vulnerable communities, to gain understanding of the best outcomes for those communities.

Sandeeka talked about climate change impacts, risks and resilience, and the importance of adaptation. She highlighted that solutions need to be context and location specific and that engineers must work closely with other professions.

Alyce spoke on the need for engineering and climate action to centre te taiao (environment) and apply manaakitanga (respect, generosity, and care). Honoring Te Tiriti is realised through active engagement and incorporating te ao Māori (Māori world view) without watering it down.

Q & A

Questions answered during the webinar:

• How can engineers re-engineer the pre-established systems to deal with major global environmental problems that could affect the survival of our species in the long run if not addressed now?
• How can siloes in government departments and engineering disciplines be overcome so that we can implement the holistic solutions often required eg for transport and planning, energy generation and storage and housing?
• How is the Living Standards Framework changing transport policy and investment, if at all?
• Where should engineers and ENZ stand on designing and building new roads, bridges and tunnels that result in increased capacity for private motor vehicles?
• How do we balance the outcomes of sustainable engineering with constraints such as materials availability, timeframes, budget?
• How might the profession continually adapt our systems, standards, design and infrastructure provision to an ever-changing risk paradigm, instead of the conventional static approach with a single-investment perspective (and pretending we can solve the climate adaptation challenge upfront)?
• How do we , anything outside the NZ Building Code will face a disproportionate amount of hurdle in terms of obtaining Building Consent from the relevant Council. Can you comment on this please?
• What has the engagement been like to date in regards to the NPS updates surrounding intensification? At first glance, it seems like the principles of this latest update don't align with our responsibilities surrounding collaboration under Te Mana O Te Wai and take a lot of power away from LGAs to manage Stormwater, Water supply and Wastewater in such a way.
• How do we work with the Agriculture sector on the changes they will need to make?

Questions not answered during the webinar included:

• Flood management practice in neighbouring countries, including the Pacific
• How do we define what sustainable engineering looks like in a holistic way?
• How do we employ today’s themes in structural engineering or other disciplines?
• Should nuclear power be considered as part of solution for a healthier, sustainable Aotearoa?
• What can we learn from other countries – and why does New Zealand seem to be struggling with basic processes and solutions?